You can read our response in full here as well as a summary of some of the key points below:
Only for existing statutory (RSHE) and non-statutory (personal financial education and careers education) to be on the same statutory footing as part of a coherent PSHE education curriculum, guaranteed for all from key stage 1.
But build on the success we have seen in raising standards and consistency since statutory RSHE was introduced. It would also recognise the overlap and interplay between statutory and non-statutory content (for example, the relationship between online safety and avoiding financial harms; the importance of effective relationship building and careers).
Many schools of all types follow this approach successfully via the existing PSHE education Programme of Study, supported by our planning tools. But all of PSHE education is only compulsory for independent schools.
This existing content needs to be a universal entitlement for all children, not some.
A UCL study shows that financial skills of 15-year-olds from socio-economically disadvantaged backgrounds are four years behind those from advantaged backgrounds, and they are less likely to learn about money in school or discuss it with their parents.
This is a deeply unfair situation that can only be rectified by making a universal entitlement to all PSHE education has to offer, including financial education and careers.
This is in line with Statutory Keeping Children Safe in Education (KCSIE) guidance recommending a 'planned programme of evidence based RSHE delivered in regularly timetabled lessons and reinforced throughout the whole curriculum', and Ofsted’s sexual harassment review recommendation that content ‘should be carefully sequenced with time allocated for topics that children and young people find difficult'.
The current, 2019 RSHE guidance sets out in broad terms what schools must teach.
It strikes about the right balance of content and prescription by outlining key content but, critically, enabling the flexibility for schools to tailor provision to pupils whilst also having the space to cover complementary non-statutory financial education and careers content within a lesson per week on the curriculum.
Therefore statutory RSHE was both a big step forward, and a missed opportunity to make PSHE statutory in entirety (as the previous Labour government had attempted to do in 2010 before plans got lost in the pre-election ‘wash-up’).